Mayhem Shield
Service offer 2 of 3

Full Deployment Assurance

Full-depth buyer-side assurance for one enterprise AI tool: architecture and data-flow evidence, full structured review depth as scoped, remediation ownership, and gate-level conditions. Does not include building or operating the vendor product.

$35K to $75K

Base range

4 to 5 weeks

Typical timeline

Full structured framework

As scoped

Right for this review

Choose Full Deployment when forums expect traceable architecture evidence, a complete findings register (as scoped), named remediation, and explicit criteria across POC, pilot, and production gates.

  • Often used for higher-complexity categories (e.g. Pure AI Services, AI-Native SaaS, AI Content Generation), still scoped per tool
  • Deployments where agentic, RAG, self-hosted, or similar overlays apply
  • Organizations that need file-ready documentation for multi-stage approval
  • Environments where regulated or sensitive data raises the evidence bar
  • Security and architecture teams who need defensible artifacts, not a vendor attestation

Scope

One AI tool, any implementation category. Full structured framework coverage including all applicable diagrams, all relevant control domains, overlays, and three approval gates; exact depth depends on architecture and implementation conditions.

  • Full assessment across all 17 gap categories (as scoped)
  • All applicable capability overlays identified and assessed
  • Stakeholder interviews across up to 15 groups
  • Six diagram types including conditional overlays
  • POC, pilot, and production gate documentation

Deliverables

Architecture diagrams

Logical architecture and data flow with control points. Conditional diagrams for agentic action flow, RAG retrieval flow, output lifecycle, and model lifecycle as applicable.

Full findings tracker

Structured coverage across the 17 gap categories with current state, required state, severity, and evidence requirements documented per review area (depth as scoped).

Stakeholder interviews

Structured interviews across up to 15 groups: Security Architecture, IAM, Network, Data Engineering, ML Engineering, Legal, Privacy, Risk, Product, and more.

Three-gate approval documentation

POC, pilot, and production gate criteria with sign-off documentation and go/no-go conditions for each stage.

Evidence collection guide

Per review-area evidence requirements with owner assignments and acceptable evidence formats.

Remediation roadmap

Remediation plan with owners, due dates, priority ordering, and dependency mapping.

Sector and regulatory cross-reference

Where named in scope: structured notes against relevant control themes (e.g. HIPAA, PCI-DSS). Legal interpretation and filings remain with your counsel and GRC teams.

Executive summary

Concise posture statement, recommendation, and conditions, suited to executive and steering readouts.

How the engagement works

Four to five weeks, one tool, full framework depth as scoped.

4-5 weeks total

  1. Discovery callDiscovery and scopingDay 0

    Classify the tool, confirm applicable overlays, align on stakeholder groups and review gates.

  2. Scoping and proposalDiscovery and scopingDays 1-3

    Within 2 to 3 business days: written scope with overlay identification, stakeholder plan, and fixed-price proposal.

  3. Scope and stakeholder alignmentDiscovery and scopingDays 1-3

    Finalize architecture documentation requirements, confirm stakeholder interview schedule, issue document request.

  4. Architecture documentationAnalysis and artifactsDays 3-7

    Build logical architecture diagram, data flow diagram with control points, and applicable conditional diagrams.

  5. Control identificationEvidence and interviewsDays 5-10

    Structured identification across all 17 gap categories with stakeholder interviews across up to 15 groups; depth depends on deployment and overlays.

  6. Remediation planningAnalysis and artifactsDays 8-14

    Map remediation owners, prioritize by severity and timeline, align on POC and pilot gate criteria.

  7. Evidence and gate approvalsFindings and handoffOngoing

    Support evidence collection, review artifacts against scoped control expectations, and prepare sign-off documentation for each gate.

  8. Post-production follow-onOptional, outside the core flowOptional

    If scoped separately: re-review triggers, monitoring criteria alignment, or a later assurance pass, by agreement, not bundled implementation work.

Pricing

$35,000 to $75,000

Fixed-price, scope-based

  • Tool category, architecture depth, and evidence availability set where an engagement lands in the range
  • Regulated data and deep evidence needs move price to the higher end

Capability overlay pricing

Overlays are priced in addition to the base range when the deployment includes them, so an engagement with several overlays totals more than the base figures above.

Agentic execution
+7 areas (typical)+$5K to $10K
RAG pipeline
+5 areas (typical)+$3K to $8K
Self-hosted model
+5 areas (typical)+$5K to $10K
Regulated data
+2 areas (typical)+$2K to $5K
Output liability
+4 areas (typical)+$2K to $5K
Integration surface
+8 areas (typical)+$2K to $5K
Final proposals are scoped after discovery. Website pricing is guidance, not a rigid rate card.
Ready to start?

Discovery calls take twenty minutes.

We confirm deployment fit, outline review scope, and match you to the right packaged offer. No engagement starts until you decide to proceed.