Mayhem Shield

Packaged implementation assurance

Three fixed-structure offers for enterprise AI deployments. Each package sets review depth, deliverables, and typical duration. None include implementing or operating the vendor product under review.

When to use which: Rapid for a fast critical/high pass on one tool; Full Deployment for complete architecture and control traceability on one production-bound tool; Portfolio when three or more tools need sequencing and shared evidence. Detail below; Pricing for bands; Framework for methodology.

Compare the three offers

Same buyer-side assurance model, different depth, duration, and tool count.

Every engagement ends with a written decision. Go, conditional go, or no-go, with explicit conditions tied to evidence, not open-ended findings lists. See sample outputs

Rapid Readiness Review

Best for

One tool and a near-term decision when approvers only need critical and high findings documented.

Typical scope

One classified tool; trust-boundary view; severity-limited structured pass.

Starting price

Starting at $15K

Typical timeline

About 2 weeks

Full Deployment Assurance Review

Best for

One production-bound deployment where forums expect full architecture traceability and a complete findings register.

Typical scope

One tool; full structured framework coverage (as scoped); staged interviews; remediation plan.

Starting price

Starting at $35K

Typical timeline

About 4 to 5 weeks

Portfolio Program

Best for

Three or more tools where sequencing, shared control evidence, and portfolio-level reporting matter to leadership.

Typical scope

Multiple tools; prioritized sequence; unified trackers and governance cadence.

Starting price

Starting at $60K

Typical timeline

About 8 to 12 weeks

What buyers receive

Deliverables vary by package, but engagements are built around concrete outputs approvers can file, trace, and defend:

  • Structured findings register aligned to control outcomes and severity
  • Evidence request list mapped to review areas and stakeholder roles
  • Implementation assurance summary suitable for security, architecture, and risk forums
  • Remediation priorities with suggested sequencing and ownership hooks
  • Decision-support findings tied to POC, pilot, and production gates where scoped

Scope boundaries

Implementation assurance reviews are designed to produce defensible assessments, not to replace functions your organization already owns:

  • Not penetration testing or red-team exercises
  • Not implementation, integration, or platform engineering delivery
  • Not legal advice, regulatory filing, or external audit opinion
  • Not a substitute for internal approval authority: you issue production decisions; we supply structured inputs
  • Not an open-ended consulting engagement: packages have defined depth, artifacts, and endpoints

Need budget figures and overlay math first? Start with Pricing. Need methodology depth? See Framework.

Ready to start?

Discovery calls take twenty minutes.

We confirm deployment fit, outline review scope, and match you to the right packaged offer. No engagement starts until you decide to proceed.